Haram Haqiqatjou #67: Haqiqatjou Makes Takfir of Jake Brancatella, The Muslim Metaphysician

Background:

Daniel Haqiqatjou refers to Jake Brancatella, the Muslim Metaphysician, as “Rabbi Jake,” a loaded insult that implies apostasy, or kufr. This is an underhanded method of takfir—the act of declaring someone outside the fold of Islam—without explicitly stating it.

⚠️ Haram Action:

  1. Implicit Takfir Without Justification
    Takfir is a serious accusation in Islam, and falsely declaring another Muslim as a disbeliever is a grave sin. The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned:

“If a man says to his brother, ‘O disbeliever,’ then it returns upon one of them.” (Bukhari, Muslim)
Haqiqatjou’s use of “Rabbi” directly associates his opponent with another faith, implying that they are no longer Muslim—without evidence or due process.

  1. Slander and Deception
    The tweet falsely attributes positions to “Rabbi Jake” to ridicule and discredit him. This is a form of buhtan (slander), which is strictly forbidden in Islam:

“And do not conceal testimony, for whoever conceals it—his heart is indeed sinful.” (Quran 2:283)
Mockery and falsehood should have no place in Muslim discourse, yet Haqiqatjou deliberately distorts his opponent’s views.

  1. Promoting Division Among Muslims
    Instead of engaging in scholarly debate, Haqiqatjou chooses mockery and insults, which only sow discord in the Muslim community. The Quran warns:

“And do not dispute and [thus] lose courage and [then] your strength would depart.” (Quran 8:46)
By using derogatory nicknames and encouraging sectarianism, Haqiqatjou fosters division rather than unity.

📜 Evidence of Haram:


✅ Takfir without basis – Implying someone is a non-Muslim through the “Rabbi” label is an indirect but clear form of wrongful takfir.
✅ Slander & Deception – The fake attribution of beliefs to “Rabbi Jake” is dishonest and un-Islamic.
✅ Sectarianism & Division – Islam commands believers to uphold unity, not childish name-calling and mockery.

Haram Haqiqatjou #66: Haqiqatjou Calls Farid “Low IQ”

Background

Daniel Haqiqatjou first praised Farid as “Too Good for Harvard,” implying exceptional intellectual and moral virtue. Later, he reversed his stance, attacking Farid as a “Low IQ Wahhabi” — mocking his intelligence and accusing him of theological deviance. This drastic shift exposes hypocrisy (nifāq) and violates Islamic ethics of consistency and integrity.

Haram Action

The incident involves two interconnected violations: exaggeration (ghuluww) in initially elevating Farid’s status beyond reasonable praise, followed by mockery (sukhriyah) and slander (buhtan) through derogatory labels like “Low IQ Wahhabi.” This contradictory behavior constitutes hypocrisy (nifāq), as Haqiqatjou first idealized Farid only to later vilify him without justification, sowing confusion (fitna) and discord within the Muslim community. Such actions violate the Islamic duty to speak truthfully, avoid harm, and uphold brotherhood.

Haram Evidence

The Quran and Sunnah explicitly condemn hypocrisy, slander, and reckless speech. Allah warns: “O you who believe, why do you say what you do not do? Most hateful it is to Allah that you say what you do not do” (Quran 61:2-3). Mocking others is forbidden: “Let not a people ridicule [another] people; perhaps they may be better than them” (Quran 49:11). The Prophet ﷺ condemned hypocrisy, defining a hypocrite as one who “betrays trust when entrusted, lies when speaking, and breaks promises” (Sahih al-Bukhari 33). Exaggeration (ghuluww) is similarly prohibited, as the Prophet ﷺ warned, “Do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary…” (Sahih al-Bukhari 3445). By flip-flopping between extremes of praise and slander, Haqiqatjou disregards these principles, undermining communal trust and Islamic ethics.

Haram Haqiqatjou #65: Pitting Al-Albani Against Ibn Abdul Wahhab

Background:
This is the Daniel Haqiqatjou bread and butter, pitting scholars against one another and introducing fitna amongst the Muslims. This is not a conversation meant for the masses, yet Haqiqatjou is adamant to continue having it.

Haram Action:
Pitting Scholars Against Each Other:
By selectively highlighting criticisms of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab by al-Albani, Haqiqatjou portrays an adversarial relationship between the two scholars. This approach fosters division rather than encouraging respect for both their contributions. Islam warns against actions that create disunity:
“And hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together and do not become divided.” (Quran 3:103).

Evidence of Haram:
This tweet disrespects Ibn Abd al-Wahhab by labeling him as “limited in knowledge” and associating him with “mass takfir,” which undermines his legacy and fuels sectarian tensions. Such accusations without clear evidence are prohibited, as the Quran states:
“If there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful.” (Quran 49:6).
Additionally, the tone of the tweet contributes to division within the Muslim community by framing two respected scholars as adversaries, which directly contradicts Islam’s emphasis on unity:
“And hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together and do not become divided.” (Quran 3:103).
Islam encourages fairness and respect in discussions, especially when addressing the legacy of scholars who have contributed significantly to Islamic thought.

Haram Haqiqatjou #64: Mocking Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab

Background:
In this post, Daniel Haqiqatjou shares a meme mocking Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab, a key figure in Islamic history and theology. The meme depicts a cartoon character with the caption “Everyone is Kaafir except me” and sarcastically refers to Ibn Abdul Wahhab as discovering the “true meaning” of Laa ilaha illallah. This caricature trivializes his contributions and misrepresents his teachings.

Haram Action:

This meme ridicules Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab, a respected Islamic scholar, reducing his theological contributions to a simplistic and sarcastic slogan. Islam prohibits mocking scholars or those who contribute to religious knowledge. The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said:
“He is not of us who does not respect our elders, show mercy to our young, and know the rights of our scholars.” (Ahmad).
Disrespecting scholars undermines their role and creates divisions within the Muslim community.

Evidence of Haram:
Mockery and Ridicule: The Quran explicitly forbids mocking others (Quran 49:11), which applies here as the meme ridicules a prominent Islamic figure.
Disunity Among Muslims: The Quran warns against division within the ummah (Quran 3:103). By targeting a specific group, this post exacerbates sectarian tensions.
False Representation: Islam prohibits misrepresenting others’ beliefs or teachings, especially when it causes harm or fosters misunderstanding (Quran 5:8).

Haram Haqiqatjou #63: Degrading a Woman with Slanderous Language

Background:
Recently, Haqiqatjou has called out others for insulting him and calling him names, rightfully so. In this tweet, Daniel Haqiqatjou refers to a Twitter user, MJ (@morganisawizard), as a “prostitute” and accuses them of potentially advocating for morally reprehensible actions in the future. The language used is vulgar and degrading, directed at an individual in a public forum.

Haram Action:
Slander and Insults: Referring to someone as a “prostitute” without evidence is buhtan (slander), which Islam forbids as a grave sin:
“And those who launch a charge against chaste women, and produce not four witnesses—flog them…” (Quran 24:4).
“And speak to people good [words].” (Quran 2:83).

Evidence of Haram:
Slander: Accusing someone without evidence is haram (Quran 24:4).
Vulgar Speech: Islam explicitly forbids obscene and degrading language (Tirmidhi).
Creating Discord: Public insults contradict Islam’s emphasis on unity and constructive dialogue (Quran 2:83).

Haram Haqiqatjou #62: Insulting Muslims as “Retarded Bootlickers”

Accusation

Daniel Haqiqatjou mocks Muhammad Umar Mustafa, sarcastically suggesting that Allah SWT sent an “army of retarded bootlickers” to avenge His awliya (friends of Allah), referring to the followers of Shaykh Faraz Rabbani and Maulana Tameem Ahmadi. Haqiqatjou uses offensive language and a disrespectful tone to mock both the scholars and their followers. All of this is explicitly haram.

Haram Action
Daniel Haqiqatjou’s use of derogatory terms like “retarded bootlickers” is clearly haram and requires seeking forgiveness from Allah SWT and the people he mocked and name called.

Evidence of Haram
Allah SWT explicitly forbids mockery and ridicule, especially in interactions with Muslims. The Quran advises:
“O you who have believed, let not a people ridicule [another] people; perhaps they may be better than them.” (Quran 49:11).

Additionally, by mocking the followers of respected scholars like Shaykh Faraz Rabbani and Maulana Tameem Ahmadi, Haqiqatjou indirectly shows disrespect to the scholars themselves. The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ emphasized the importance of honoring scholars:
“He is not of us who does not respect our elders, show mercy to our young, and know the rights of our scholars.” (Ahmad).

Haram Haqiqatjou #61: Calls Fellow Muslim Abdullah Ibn Rabbat a Donkey

Accusation:

Daniel Haqiqatjou refers to Abdullah Ibn Rabbat as a “donkey” and accuses him of gaslighting during a discussion about Sayyidna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him). Haqiqatjou criticizes Rabbat for saying Ali “lacked political prowess” and uses unacceptable language to express his frustration:
“Rather than put this donkey in his place, you are trying to gaslight us. Disappointing.”

Haram Action:
Daniel Haqiqatjou’s tweet is haram, plain and simple. He insults and demeans another Muslim by calling him a “donkey”, a clear violation of Islamic etiquette. The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said:
“The believer is not a slanderer, nor does he curse others, and he is not vulgar or obscene in speech” (Tirmidhi).
Insulting others, especially in the context of religious debate, is not only harmful but also creates unnecessary hostility.

Evidence of Haram:
The Quran explicitly forbids name-calling and insults among Muslims. Allah says:
“And do not insult one another and do not call each other by [offensive] nicknames.” (Quran 49:11).

Haram Haqiqatjou #60: Insulting and Accusing Fellow Muslims of Genocide

Haram Action: (on Both Sides): Both Haqiqatjou and Damask Publishers are guilty of using offensive and inappropriate language. Islam emphasizes maintaining dignity and respect, especially in public discourse. Referring to someone as a “coward” or accusing them of aiding genocide without evidence is a form of slander (ghibah) and false accusation (buhtan). Similarly, Damask Publishers’ language, such as wishing Haqiqatjou to “Go to Hell” and hoping for his humiliation, is equally against Islamic teachings. The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said: “The believer is not a slanderer, nor does he curse others, and he is not vulgar or obscene in speech” (Tirmidhi). Both parties violate these principles by engaging in a heated, offensive exchange.

Evidence of Haram: Islam promotes respectful discourse, even in disagreements. The Quran says, “And speak to people good [words]” (2:83). The use of offensive terms and accusing another Muslim of complicity in genocide is reckless and damaging. Furthermore, the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ advised us to make dua for each other’s guidance, not for curses or harm.

Impact on the Ummah: By accusing a fellow Muslim of supporting genocide and publicly insulting them, Haqiqatjou contributes to unnecessary division and fitnah (discord) within the Muslim community. The Prophet ﷺ emphasized unity, saying: “The believers, in their mutual love, mercy, and compassion, are like one body; if one part of the body feels pain, the whole body responds with wakefulness and fever” (Bukhari). Instead of promoting unity, this kind of rhetoric fuels hostility and deepens divisions.

Haram Haqiqatjou #59: Haqiqatjou Calls Abdullah Al-Rabbat a Donkey

Accusation: In this tweet, Daniel Haqiqatjou refers to Abdullah al-Rabbat as a “donkey” and calls his comments on Sayyidna Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) “filthy,” accusing al-Rabbat of attacking the family of the Prophet ﷺ.

Haram Action: Islam forbids slandering and insulting others, even in the midst of disagreement. Calling another Muslim a “donkey” or using demeaning language like “filthy” contradicts the Islamic values of respect and adab (etiquette) in discourse. This tweet creates unnecessary division and escalates hostility among Muslims.

Evidence of Haram: The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said, “The believer is not a slanderer, nor does he curse others, and he is not vulgar or obscene in speech” (Tirmidhi). By resorting to such offensive language, Haqiqatjou is violating the principles of respectful dialogue, which are essential in maintaining unity and compassion within the ummah.

Impact on the Ummah: Instead of promoting constructive discussion, these words could lead to fitnah (discord) by exacerbating tensions between Muslims. The Quran reminds us: “O you who have believed, let not a people ridicule [another] people; perhaps they may be better than them” (49:11). By publicly insulting another Muslim, Haqiqatjou is damaging the very unity he claims to defend.

Haram Haqiqatjou #58: Slandering a Muslim Organization

Haram Action :

Daniel Haqiqatjou is simply a liar and slanderer. There’s no other way to put it.
1) Yasqueen is mockery and slander of a dawah org called Yaqeen
2) Says Yaqeen launched a campaign to brand him an ignorant liar, ZERO proof of this
3) Calls it a soy article. Just a foul person.

Evidence of Haram:

The Prophet ﷺ said, “I guarantee a house in Jannah for one who gives up arguing, even if he is in the right; and I guarantee a home in the middle of Jannah for one who abandons lying even for the sake of fun; and I guarantee a house in the highest part of Jannah for one who has beautiful manners”